Gerunds are formed by adding –ing to the end of a verb. Some examples are eating, playing, and listening. Infinitives use to before the verb so the examples above would be to eat, to play, and to listen. Both can be used as the subject or object of a sentence. The negative version of both gerunds and infinitives is made simply by adding not.
When a noun comes before the gerund, we can apply the possessive case to that noun. The gerund in this case acts as a noun. The structure of possessive with gerund is: we start with the clause followed by a noun, the possessive case (with the ‘s ), the gerund and then the rest of the sentence. For example: — “John’s winning of the
In English, the gerund is the noun form of a verb, such as swimming in the sentence below. In Spanish, this form is often translated using an infinitive, such as nadar . examples I can't think of an example of reduce + verb. 1 and 2 are wrong. "He reduced the production of metal." is possible. But I'd used "decreased" in this sentence, or "He reduced the production level of metal." Maybe that's a stylistic issue. As far as 'reduced + gerund', you can say, "I reduced my spending on luxuries." The easiest way to tell the difference between the gerund and the present participle is to look for the helping verb “be”. If you find a form of “be” followed by the -ing form, that’s the present participle. For example: They’ve have been working for four hours. If the -ing form begins the sentence, or follows a verb or preposition
The "to infinitive", in that example, is a noun phrase; a gerund is a noun, and a noun is a noun. So they are all the same. So they are all the same. Only one question mark is used in English, and there is no space between between words and punctuation.
You must use a prepositional phrase instead, such as “go ‘on a trip’”. Once again, the simple explanation is because ‘trip’ is an inherent noun in this case (as opposed to the verb, ‘to trip’), whereas ‘swimming’ is a ‘created’ noun, a gerund. In light of that, a somewhat related area of confusion is “I am going crazy.”.
Perfect infinitive with to ( to have worked ) - English Grammar Today - a reference to written and spoken English grammar and usage - Cambridge Dictionary
See my answer to the duplicate regarding this not actually being a gerund, but the present participle. The short answer is that it is possible to use both, but the infinitive is far more natural, whereas using a gerund after want has an air of "business-speak" or "managementese" I would personally try to avoid.
t8C9y9.
  • 3pwftqu88h.pages.dev/647
  • 3pwftqu88h.pages.dev/395
  • 3pwftqu88h.pages.dev/724
  • 3pwftqu88h.pages.dev/520
  • 3pwftqu88h.pages.dev/311
  • 3pwftqu88h.pages.dev/774
  • 3pwftqu88h.pages.dev/429
  • 3pwftqu88h.pages.dev/135
  • 3pwftqu88h.pages.dev/120
  • 3pwftqu88h.pages.dev/933
  • 3pwftqu88h.pages.dev/689
  • 3pwftqu88h.pages.dev/670
  • 3pwftqu88h.pages.dev/231
  • 3pwftqu88h.pages.dev/780
  • 3pwftqu88h.pages.dev/559

    • gerund to infinitive examples